Workplace training versus traditional classroom training

Teaching in the classroom and teaching or training in the workplace may seem, to the inexperienced eye, to be one in the same technique. A person gets up in front of a group and imparts information to them. The group is them tested or evaluated in some manner to determine what has been learned. Although some of the techniques used for each may have some resemblance, there are numerous differences between the two.

Similarities

A learning process is expected to take place. A building process, moving from simple to more complex concepts. Learning is to be applied in some manner.

Differences

Traditional Classroom

Theory-based applications
Teacher/student relationship
Standardized learning objectives (often mandated by the state)
Grade based
Little or no feedback given by students
Taught one way
Subject based
Done, once course has ended
No focus on the "self"
Teacher has small stake in whether subject is learned
No bearing on job performance
Workplace Training

Real world applications
Peer/colleague relationship
Objectives based on organizational targets & goals
No grades
Evaluation of class by attendees
Flexibility in teaching styles
Idea/concept based
May revisit topic as needed
Assists in the self-actualization process
Learning is a win-win situation for organization and attendees
Seeks to improve job performance